opal AT lists.psi.ch
Subject: The OPAL Discussion Forum
List archive
- From: Andreas Adelmann <andreas.adelmann AT psi.ch>
- To: Opal AT lists.psi.ch
- Subject: Re: [Opal] Field Map Scaling
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2011 07:28:55 +0200
- List-archive: <https://lists.web.psi.ch/pipermail/opal/>
- List-id: The OPAL Discussion Forum <opal.lists.psi.ch>
(AA: and here the original post of Chris)
In the process of comparing Bmad's time tracker with OPAL, I make a 2D field
map based on pillbox fields (equations below). According to the OPAL manual,
the basic columns are: E_z, E_\rho, dummy, B_t (which I assume is B_\phi).
However, I seem to need to scale this last column by a factor of 10^6 to get
the correct focusing. Is this documented?
Thanks!
- Chris -
Attachment:
PastedGraphic-1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
On Aug 22, 2011, at 7:26 AM, Andreas Adelmann wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> It really seems that the H_\phi ( = (1/\mu_0) B_\phi ) needs to be scaled
> by exactly 10^6 in the field map file. Below is a test with Bmad (black)
> and OPAL (red) through a 7-cell pillbox cavities. To check what Bmad is
> doing, I also integrated the equations of motion in Mathematica, shown in
> blue in the second plot.
>
> In OPAL, how does the field map figure out the phase of the H-field? Do you
> assume that it oscillates pi/2 out of phase with the E-field? Otherwise,
> the field map file would need more information.
>
> To keep you up-to-date, I have field map data for our 'real' 7-cell cavity,
> and will be doing comparisons with OPAL and Bmad soon.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris
>
> _______________________________________________
> Opal mailing list
> Opal AT lists.psi.ch
> https://lists.web.psi.ch/mailman/listinfo/opal
- [Opal] Field Map Scaling, Andreas Adelmann, 08/22/2011
- Re: [Opal] Field Map Scaling, Andreas Adelmann, 08/22/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.