opal AT lists.psi.ch
Subject: The OPAL Discussion Forum
List archive
- From: Nicole Neveu <nneveu AT hawk.iit.edu>
- To: opal <opal AT lists.psi.ch>
- Subject: [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T
- Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 21:54:52 -0600
Hi OPAL'ers,
I recently tried to add a second 3DDynamic RF fieldmap to one of my beam line simulations in OPAL-T. I was seeing no energy gain in the second cavity with this beamline layout:
3D RF gun ----Solenoids --- 3D RF Linac
After trying this and that, phase scan, etc, I paired the 3D Linac with a 2D gun, and saw energy gain:
2D RF gun ----Solenoids--- 3D RF Linac
Has anyone else seen this behavior? Do both cavities need to be exactly the same phase for OPAL to autophase or sync them? In this case, the desired freq is 1.3 GHz, and the two field maps differ by ~0.2 MHz. My guess is that is too small to make a difference?
I can send input files and data, if interested.
Thanks,
Nicole
- [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T, Nicole Neveu, 03/10/2017
- Re: [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T, Christof Metzger-Kraus, 03/10/2017
- Re: [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T, Nicole Neveu, 03/10/2017
- Re: [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T, Christof Metzger-Kraus, 03/19/2017
- RE: [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T, Power, John, 03/19/2017
- RE: [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T, Nicole Neveu, 03/19/2017
- Re: [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T, Christof Metzger-Kraus, 03/19/2017
- Re: [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T, Adelmann Andreas (PSI), 03/19/2017
- Message not available
- Re: [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T, Christof Metzger-Kraus, 03/19/2017
- RE: [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T, Power, John, 03/19/2017
- Re: [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T, Christof Metzger-Kraus, 03/19/2017
- Re: [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T, Nicole Neveu, 03/10/2017
- Re: [Opal] 3D Field Maps in OPAL-T, Christof Metzger-Kraus, 03/10/2017
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.