The OPAL Discussion Forum

["Adelmann Andreas (PSI)" <andreas.adelmann AT psi.ch>]

Hi Jarno you need to define the charge for example

REAL f1   = 50.65;  // MHz 

"RIB": BEAM, MASS=E0*1e-3, charge=1.0, ENERGY=E_TOT*1e-3, npart=10.0, BCURRENT=1.0E-6, BFREQ= f1;

Still, something seams to be off with the rest-mass. Consider to check by printing some values like:

value, {sr_gamma, E0};

STOP;

Otherwise I will look at this again.

Cheers Andy 

------
Dr. sc. math. Andreas (Andy) Adelmann
Head a.i. Labor for Scientific Computing and Modelling 
Paul Scherrer Institut OHSA/ CH-5232 Villigen PSI
Phone Office: xx41 56 310 42 33 Fax: xx41 56 310 31 91
Zoom ID: 470-582-4086 Password: AdA

Zoom Link: https://ethz.zoom.us/j/4705824086?pwd=dFcvT1pMMGY0bHg0dTNncUNZZTJkZz09

-------------------------------------------------------
Friday: ETH HPK G 28   +41 44 633 3076
============================================
The more exotic, the more abstract the knowledge, 
the more profound will be its consequences.
Leon Lederman 
============================================

On 5 Apr 2022, at 15:52, Van de Walle Jarno <jarno.van.de.walle AT sckcen.be> wrote:

Hello,

 

I’m new to OPAL and I’m trying to simulate a beamline for radioactive ions, which I did in MAD-X, now in OPAL.

The properties of the beam are:

Mass = 100 (amu)

Energy = 60 keV (!)

The beamline consists of 4 quad doublets and 1 dipole (112 degrees).

In MAD-X this runs smoothly and I wanted to check first of all if I can get similar results with OPAL. The next step would be to include a real 3D magnetic field map for the dipole in OPAL (which is not possible in MAD-X).

 

The first results are not encouraging L

I encounter multiple issues – which are probably related to a misinterpretation of the input file needs …

E.g.:

- when including the dipole, the tracking takes way too long to be realistic (so somewhere the tracking blocks)

- If I exclude the dipole (like in the attached inputfile), I see that The Kinetic energy of the beam is suddenly 4.528 GeV with dE = 19.686 MeV ?! No idea why …

 

I’m in any case convinced that OPAL could help us further in the simulation of our Radioactive Ion Beam beamlines and in the future our 100 MeV proton accelerator.

May I ask you to run the attached input file and/or hint towards my (obvious, maybe J) mistakes ?

 

Any help is highly appreciated !

Many thanks in advance and kind regards

Jarno

 

 

 

Jarno Van de Walle, PhD
Beam physicist

<image001.jpg>

+32 14 33 84 16 ǀ +32 470 20 98 31

-

<image006.png>

 

Belgian Nuclear Research Centre

Boeretang 200 - 2400 Mol – Belgium

www.sckcen.be

 

<image007.png>

 

<IaM.in>