The OPAL Discussion Forum

[Zhi Li <zhili29882 AT gmail.com>]

Hi Andreas,

I found the reason why I thought there was no magnetic field in the simulation. When I got this field map from a colleague, they had mislabeled B as H, so the values are smaller by a factor of mu. After I corrected this the results looked similar to what they had in GPT code. Thanks for the help!

Best regards,

Zhi

On Tue, Jan 17, 2023 at 3:32 PM Adelmann Andreas <andreas.adelmann AT psi.ch> wrote:

Hi Zhi I think your E values are off and the number of points

per dimension is also not matching up with the number of entries in the file.

Check the description of 

The OPAL Framework: Version 2022.1-dev web.psi.ch

Cheers A
------
Dr. sc. math. Andreas (Andy) Adelmann
Head a.i. Labor for Scientific Computing and Modelling 
Paul Scherrer Institut OHSA/D09 CH-5232 Villigen PSI
Phone Office: xx41 56 310 42 33 Fax: xx41 56 310 31 91
Zoom ID: 470-582-4086 Password: AdA
Zoom Link: https://ethz.zoom.us/j/4705824086?pwd=dFcvT1pMMGY0bHg0dTNncUNZZTJkZz09

-------------------------------------------------------
Friday: ETH HPK G 28   +41 44 633 3076
============================================
The more exotic, the more abstract the knowledge, 
the more profound will be its consequences.
Leon Lederman 
============================================

On 17 Jan 2023, at 19:45, Zhi Li <zhili29882 AT gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Andreas,

I found that my simulation is not implementing the magnetic field and radial component of the electric field. I checked this by looking at the output file and the datasets for Ex_ref, Ey_ref, Bx_ref, By_ref, Bz_ref are all 0. I am using the 2DDynamic field map format. What can I do to fix this? Thanks for the help!

Best regards,

Zhi

<map and input file.zip>