The OPAL Discussion Forum

[Christof Metzger-Kraus <christof.j.kraus AT gmail.com>]

Hi Jonathan,

some of the Astra-type field maps got forgotten when I implemented the possibility to switch off normalization... This is now fixed.

Could you send me the input file and the field maps of your problem?

christof

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:52 PM, Jonathan Edelen <jedelen AT radiasoft.net> wrote:

I am using 1.9.x (the pull is from sometime in late November/early December I believe)

Jon

On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 1:48 PM, Adelmann Andreas (PSI) <andreas.adelmann AT psi.ch> wrote:

Hi Jonathan are you using 1.9.x or 1.6?
A

------
Dr. sc. math. Andreas (Andy) Adelmann
Staff Scientist
Paul Scherrer Institut WBBA/219 CH-5232 Villigen PSI
Phone Office: xx41 56 310 42 33 Fax: xx41 56 310 31 91
Phone Home: xx41 62 891 91 44
-------------------------------------------------------
Friday: ETH HPK G 28   +41 44 632 75 22
============================================
The more exotic, the more abstract the knowledge,
the more profound will be its consequences.
Leon Lederman
============================================

> On 10 Jan 2018, at 18:50, Jonathan Edelen <jedelen AT radiasoft.net> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have been having issues with the scaling on traveling wave cavities. OPAL is not scaling the imported fields based on the voltage defined in the input file. When I import a 1-D field map with external scaling applied and override OPAL's internal scaling I get the correct answer. Has anyone else had this issue?
>
> Also when I tried to issue the override flag for the AstraDynamic type of field map OPAL returned an error that there was an unexpected string at the end of the first line. Has anyone else tried to override OPAL's scaling for an AstraDynamic type map?
>
> We are currently using a build from source from a couple of months ago.
>
> Cheers,
> Jon
>
>