Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

h5part - Re: [H5part] Re: H5Block and ghost zones

h5part AT

Subject: H5Part development and discussion

List archive

Re: [H5part] Re: H5Block and ghost zones

Chronological Thread 
  • From: Mark Howison <MHowison AT>
  • To: Achim Gsell <Achim.Gsell AT>
  • Cc: Andreas Adelmann <andreas.adelmann AT>, h5part AT, John Shalf <JShalf AT>
  • Subject: Re: [H5part] Re: H5Block and ghost zones
  • Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:39:58 -0700
  • List-archive: <>
  • List-id: H5Part development and discussion <>

Yes, that would be a better approach. I will implement it today. Mark

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 6:02 AM, Achim Gsell <Achim.Gsell AT> wrote:
> On Jul 14, 2010, at 1:20 AM, Andreas Adelmann wrote:
>> Hi Mark ok now I understand.
>> In case of a stencil based computation with a very anisotropic computation
>> domain I can think of such cases. So we probable want to keep this feature
>> but maybe have a configure option to ride the more easy way; i.e. all the
>> dimensions have the same number of ghost nodes. This just in case of you
>> very well observed problem with O(1E6) cores.
>> What do you think ?
> After defining the layout, we don't need the information for all processes
> any more. So, why not allocating the memory in the layout-defining function
> and releasing it before we leave this function?
> Achim

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.19.

Top of Page